CropVision: A Multiscale EO-AI-Climate-Biophysical modelling framework for predicting crop performance in Australian wheat and sorghum systems

Clicks: 1
ID: 319638
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #8 of 9 articles by views in in silico Plants

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Australian dryland grain production systems are under increasing pressure from climate variability, extremes and market uncertainty, driving the need for earlier and more spatially explicit estimates of crop condition, grain yield and production. This paper presents an overview of CropVision, a crop forecasting system developed by The University of Queensland, Australia. It is presented here as an integrated framework for monitoring and predicting crop performance across regional, farm, and field scales. CropVision is an integrated framework that links seasonal climate forecasts, biophysical crop modelling and Earth observation (EO) to predict crop performance from region to field for wheat and sorghum in Australia. In this study, crop performance refers to spatial and temporal variation in yield, crop area, crop stress and hyperspectral-derived proxies for solar-induced fluorescence (SIF) used to characterise crop condition and production across scales. CropVision is designed to improve both temporal lead time and spatial resolution. Seasonal forecast ensembles were calibrated and downscaled to drive crop simulations, providing useful production outlooks up to four months before sowing, although forecast lead time and accuracy varied across regions and between crop types. High-resolution Earth observation data at peak canopy were used to scale crop estimates from field to farm to regional levels. Crop indices were derived from Sentinel-2 (S2) multispectral data linked to canopy structure, chlorophyll and crop stress. As a preliminary analysis, we evaluated field-scale wheat yield estimation using SIF proxies derived from EnMAP hyperspectral imagery across 25 fields over two contrasting winter seasons. At field scale, the AI-EO–biophysical wheat yield model achieved robust performance across 375 fields over five winter seasons, with R2 = 0.76 and RMSE = 0.46 t/ha. At farm scale, application of the modelling approach in 2024 produced a predicted mean wheat yield of 3.40 t/ha compared with an observed mean of 2.91 t/ha, equivalent to an absolute error of 0.49 t/ha and a +16% deviation. At regional scale, wheat production estimates generated by the approach for Moree Plains district in the 2020 census year differed by 12.5% from Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) estimates, illustrating the robustness of the framework in integrating crop area and yield to derive production. In the hyperspectral analysis, the best-performing fluorescence-sensitive proxy explained up to 87% of observed field-scale wheat yield variability across contrasting Western Australian environments. Together, these results show that integrating seasonal climate foresight, crop biophysics, and EO can improve crop performance forecasting in Australian wheat and sorghum systems by linking pre-sowing regional outlooks with within-season field-scale estimates.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167339033 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Andries Potgieter, Jason Brider, Davoud Ashourloo, Andrew Schepen, Yan Zhao, Ruizhu Jiang, Scott Chapman, Miao Zhang, Bingfang Wu, Kerry Russell, Graeme Hammer
Journal in silico Plants
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/insilicoplants/diag018
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.