Predictors of vaping relapse among young e-cigarette users: Machine learning-based survival analysis of a smartphone app-derived longitudinal data

Clicks: 1
ID: 319635
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #68 of 121 articles by views in nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the society for research on nicotine and tobacco

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Although many young people attempt to quit vaping nicotine, limited evidence exists on factors associated with relapse. We aimed to predict time to vaping relapse and identify key predictors among young e-cigarette users attempting to quit. Methods Data was sourced from the “Stop Vaping Challenge” smartphone app users aged 15-35 years (n = 311), who initiated 387 quit challenges. We used 10x5-fold nested cross-validation to train and test three machine learning-based survival models, including random survival forest (RSF), GBM survival, and XGBoost survival to predict time to vaping relapse (i.e., duration of a single quit challenge). The best performing model was carried forward for Shapely Additive ExPlanations analysis, providing individual-level interpretations of predictive factors. Results More than two-thirds of the 387 quit challenges resulted in relapse. Approximately 12.8% of abstinent challenges and 9.71% of relapsed challenges lasted at least 7 days. The GBM survival model achieved the highest average C-index (0.629 ± 0.063), followed by the RSF model (0.624 ± 0.073). The final GBM survival model (C-index 0.694) demonstrated comparable performance in sensitivity analysis. Lower self-confidence in quitting and weaker intention to quit were the most important predictors of faster relapse. Additionally, pod depletion time, time to first vape, past 30-day alcohol drinking, past month frequency of vaping, mood trend during challenge, and reasons for quitting consistently emerged as important predictors across different models. Conclusions We identified key predictors of relapse among young e-cigarette users using smartphone app-based longitudinal data. Future research is needed to assess reliability and generalizability of the model across diverse populations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167341862 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Anasua Kundu, Peter Selby, Daniel Felsky, Theo J Moraes, Michael Chaiton
Journal nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the society for research on nicotine and tobacco
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ntr/ntag137
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntag137
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.