Could we discuss the molecular signature of immune dysregulation?
Clicks: 3
ID: 319628
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
3 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #17 of 30 articles by views in Clinical & Experimental Immunology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Immune dysregulation (ID), defined as aberrant immune activation or suppression, may result in autoimmune or inflammatory disorders, lymphoproliferative malignancies, and allergic diseases. Apoptosis, nuclear factor-κB (NFκB), and phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathways are major pathways involved in ID. Objective This study aimed to assess ID using targeted inflammatory gene-expression profiles in comparison with controls. Methods We grouped patients according to presenting features: autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome (ALPS) (group 1), immune cytopenia (group 2), and EBV-associated lymphoproliferation (group 3). We established real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) analysis for selected genes (CASP8, CASP10, FAS, FASL, AKT, MAP3K7, MAP3K14, mTOR, NFKB1, NFKB2, NFKBIA, and TRAF3) involved in inflammatory pathways, and calculated gene expression fold changes using the logarithmic Delta-Delta Ct (2^(–delta delta CT)) method. Results The median age of symptom onset in group 1 (n=10), group 2 (n=12), and group 3 (n=10) was 9.3 (0.5-38.7), 5.7 (0.7-19), 22.5 (0.7-45) years, respectively (p=0.181). The median age at hospital admission was 12 (1.9-38.7), 9.4 (2.3-35), and 34.8 (0.9-54.7) years in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (p=0.152). There was a significant difference between patient and control groups (p<0.05), but none among patient groups regarding targeted gene expression (relative quantification values). According to ROC curve analysis, the most discriminative target genes are NFKB2, MAP3K7, AKT, mTOR, NFKB1, and FAS. Conclusion We propose an ID signature that includes targeted gene expression profiles (NFKB1, NFKB2, MAP3K7, AKT, mTOR, and FAS) and suggest using these specific gene expressions as a biomarker for diagnosis and therapy response in ID.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167331361
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Hacer Neslihan Bildik, İsmail Yaz, Saliha Esenboğa, Deniz Çağdaş |
| Journal | Clinical & Experimental Immunology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/cei/uxag038
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.