Ultra-Early Mobilization After Split-Thickness Skin Grafting in Burn Patients Is Not Associated with Graft Loss
Clicks: 1
ID: 319483
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #73 of 73 articles by views in journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Timing of mobilization following split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) in burn patients varies amongst burn centers, due to concerns for graft loss with earlier post-operative mobilization. Existing literature supports the feasibility of earlier mobilization after STSG but is limited in scope. This study aimed to explore the association between time to mobilization after STSG and graft loss, hypothesizing that ultra-early mobilization within 24 hours of STSG does not increase the risk of graft loss. Adult patients who underwent STSG for treatment of thermal burn injuries at an ABA-verified burn center from 2021-2024 were included. Each incident of STSG was categorized as ultra-early (≤24 hours) or late (>24 hours) mobilization. Mobilization cohorts were then compared by graft loss using an institutional grading scale, defined as graft loss >50% of the area grafted, requiring prolonged wound care, or requiring re-operation. Mobilization was defined as either passive or active movement. Of the 240 patients included, there were a total of 431 STSG. Of these, 69 patients were critically ill with a total of 193 STSG. Rates of graft loss were similar between groups (9% vs 9.2%; P =0.93). Neither ultra-early mobilization (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.20-1.73; P = 0.33) or ambulation compared to in-bed exercises (OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.36-5.50; P = 0.62) increased the odds of graft loss. The findings suggest that ultra-early mobilization within 24 hours after STSG does not increase the risk of graft loss in burn patients, and out-of-bed ambulation does not increase the risk of graft loss compared to in-bed therapy.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7167065826
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Maybelle E Singson, Desiree Pinto, Katherine F Wallace, Emily Woolhiser, Katelyn Marzo, Tuan Le, Bonnie C Carney, Lauren T. Moffatt, Jamie Oh, Taryn E Travis, Jeffrey W. Shupp, Shawn Tejiram |
| Journal | journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jbcr/irag113
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.