A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Role of Open Platysmaplasty in Face and Neck Lift Surgery: Comparative Outcomes of Closed vs Open Neck Rejuvenation With Liposuction Using FACE-Q Scales

Clicks: 2
ID: 319461
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #11 of 81 articles by views in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Facial and neck rejuvenation techniques have evolved significantly, aiming to achieve optimal patient satisfaction with minimal invasiveness. Open platysmaplasty techniques allow direct access to anatomical structures but involve additional scarring, whereas closed techniques are less invasive but might provide limited correction. There remains uncertainty regarding patient-reported outcomes between these approaches. Objectives This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed patient-reported outcomes (FACE-Q Aesthetic Module scores) comparing open versus closed neck rejuvenation techniques, with and without liposuction. Methods A systematic review was performed following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, searching databases (MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PubMed, Cochrane Library) from inception to November 2024. Studies comparing open and closed neck lift techniques and reporting FACE-Q scores were included. Data were analyzed using weighted means, pooled standard deviations, and Welch’s t-tests to compare satisfaction scores. Results Nine studies with 847 patients were analyzed. When liposuction was employed, open techniques significantly improved neck aesthetic satisfaction (mean FACE-Q = 81.5) compared to closed techniques (mean FACE-Q = 77.5, p = 0.022), though chin scores were comparable (p = 0.268). Closed techniques without liposuction yielded the highest satisfaction scores for both chin (mean FACE-Q = 86.4) and neck (mean FACE-Q = 86.6), significantly exceeding open techniques with liposuction (p < 0.01). Conclusions Closed neck rejuvenation techniques without liposuction showed highest patient-reported outcomes for appropriately selected patients, emphasizing the importance of individualized surgical planning. Open techniques retain significant value for patients requiring more extensive anatomical correction.
Reference Key
openalex_W7167101026 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Giuseppe Fiore, Naghmeh Naderi, Benedict Reed, Lauren Andrea Laird, Rana Das‐Gupta
Journal Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/asjof/ojag140
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojag140
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.