A Resilient Product Design Model Based on Functional Backtrace and Its Evaluation Method
Clicks: 9
ID: 319198
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
2.4
/100
9 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #18 of 31 articles by views in journal of computational design and engineering
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Products are facing an increasing number of high-impact disruptions that can cause catastrophic failures. Although periodic maintenance, structural reinforcement, and optimization improve reliability, products suffer failure due to inadequate preparedness under high-impact disruptions. Resilient products absorb disruptions, adapt to dynamic environments, and recover from failure, which extends product life and effectively responds to high-impact disruptions. However, endowing products with resilience during the design phase poses two challenges to the existing design models: (a) These models require clearly defined design objectives in the early stage, but the resilient design needs to consider potential structural failures caused by disruptions, which are difficult to specify early on. (b) How to minimize its side effects while enhancing product resilience, such as cost fluctuations and reductions in user satisfaction. To address these issues, a resilient product design model based on functional backtrace and its evaluation method is proposed. High-impact disruptions evolve resilient design principles into requirements to guide functional-structural mapping. Risky functions and structures are identified along the disruption-structural failure-functional failure network (DSFN). Resilient design factors, including absorption, adaptation, recovery, learning, and service, are incorporated to enable risky functions and structures to respond to disruptions, thereby enhancing product resilience. Candidate design schemes are configured among these factors based on NSGA-Ⅱ under constraints of cost, weight, and carbon emissions, and ranked via rough VIKOR to meet user requirements. A grab drilling machine example illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7166888898
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Yang M, Xin Guo, Chong Jiang, Linhong Jiang, Hailong Liao, Wu Zhao, Kai Zhang |
| Journal | journal of computational design and engineering |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jcde/qwag063
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.