Alternative Silvicultural Systems Maintain Multiple Values in Tall Eucalypt Forest

Clicks: 17
ID: 319182
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #18 of 35 articles by views in forest science and technology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Accelerating the development of more heterogeneous forest structures is an important goal of many contemporary forest management regimes. However, long-term silvicultural experiments that compare different approaches to generating structural complexity are rare. We took advantage of a replicated silvicultural experiment that was established in mountain ash ( Eucalyptus regnans ) forests in southeastern Australia in the late 1980s. We evaluated multi-decadal forest development responses to seven different silvicultural treatments: clearfelling (clearcutting), seed tree, three gap sizes (0.25, 0.5, and 2 ha), and two levels of overstorey retention (30% and 50%), plus unharvested controls. We compared a range of stand structural and compositional attributes, non-timber values (e.g., sequestered carbon, total sapwood area [a proxy for stand water-use]), and habitat features in 53 study plots replicated across all of the silvicultural treatments. Thirty years after the experiment was initiated, three treatment groups were apparent: 1) the gap (0.25-2 ha) treatments were dominated by small-diameter mountain ash, a greater abundance of Acacia , and relatively low basal area; 2) the clearfell and seed tree treatments had moderate basal area of mountain ash and the most uniform size-class distributions; and 3) the overstorey retention treatments had the largest trees across all treatments, as well as the greatest basal area and size inequality. Our findings indicate that alternative silvicultural systems could be used to accelerate the development of large trees and complex forest structures and support a broader range of forest values than the standard clearfell, burn, and sow silviculture prescriptions historically applied in mountain ash forests.
Reference Key
openalex_W7166802892 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kaitlyn L. Hammond, Craig R. Nitschke, Raphaël Trouvé, Patrick J. Baker
Journal forest science and technology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1007/s44391-026-00076-6
URL
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44391-026-00076-6
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.