Proteomic signatures as biomarkers of atherosclerosis burden

Clicks: 1
ID: 319105
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #102 of 103 articles by views in cardiovascular research

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
AIMS: Atherosclerosis is currently evaluated by imaging, but scalable circulating biomarkers to detect its presence and quantify overall burden are lacking. We sought to define plasma proteomic signatures that reflect the systemic burden of atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In UK Biobank, we trained machine-learning models on plasma proteomics in a nested, propensity-score-matched case-control sample (1,666 cases; 1,666 controls; Olink Explore 3072, 2,920 proteins) to derive four AtheroBurden signatures: one based on the entire proteome (all 2,920 proteins) and three biologically informed subsets-genetically anchored (n = 402), atherogenesis-related (n = 680), and artery-enriched (n = 248). We then computed individual-level signatures in 41,200 disease-free participants and validated their performance through 1) correlation with carotid plaque burden via ultrasound (n = 1,712); 2) prospective major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) prediction over 13.7-year follow-up using multivariable Cox models and incremental prediction over Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation version 2 (SCORE2) (ΔC-index; net reclassification improvement [NRI]); as well as in the external Cooperative Health Research in the Region of Augsburg (KORA) S4 (n = 1,361) and Age1 (n = 796) cohorts; and 3) longitudinal trajectories analysis in 1,210 participants with three serial proteomic measurements.All four AtheroBurden signatures robustly discriminated prevalent atherosclerotic disease (ROC-AUC up to 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89-0.93) with their levels significantly increasing with the number of clinically affected vascular beds. We found significant correlations with carotid ultrasound-measured plaque burden. In prospective analysis, each signature exhibited strong associations with incident MACE (HR per SD increase in whole proteome signature: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.68-1.83; HR for Q4 vs. Q1: 3.18, 95% CI: 2.8-3.61), providing significant improvements in risk discrimination (ΔC-index: +0.044; p < 0.0001) and reclassification (NRI: 0.12 (95% CI: 0.09-0.15) at a 10% risk threshold) beyond SCORE2. These results were replicated in the KORA S4 and KORA-Age1 cohorts, where the signatures were associated with risk of future myocardial infarction and stroke. Furthermore, longitudinal analyses demonstrated steeper annual increases in proteomic signature among individuals with higher burden of vascular risk factors and individuals who experienced MACE over follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma proteomic signatures effectively capture atherosclerotic burden and improve cardiovascular risk prediction in asymptomatic individuals. They may complement existing risk stratification by serving as a scalable and accessible blood-based screening tool to identify individuals more likely to have subclinical atherosclerosis and may benefit from confirmatory imaging and earlier prevention strategies.
Reference Key
openalex_W7166522997 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Lanyue Zhang, Murad Omarov, LingLing Xu, B.N. Das, Luo Hong, Stefanie M. Hauck, Agnese Petrera, Zhi Yu, Sascha N. Goonewardena, E Zeggini, A Peters, Martin Dichgans, Venkatesh L Murthy, B Thorand, Marios K. Georgakis
Journal cardiovascular research
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/cvr/cvag140
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvag140
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.