Wound Dressing and Post-Operative Complications Following Breast Reduction: A Retrospective Study of 250 Patients

Clicks: 1
ID: 318917
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #73 of 81 articles by views in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Post-operative wound dressings are routine but understudied in reduction mammoplasty. While an ideal dressing should promote healing, limit infection, and be well-tolerated, practice varies widely without consensus. Objectives This study compares the impact of dressings on post-operative outcomes following reduction mammoplasty. Methods A single-institution, retrospective review was performed of reduction mammoplasty patients. Data included demographics, operative details, dressing type, and complications. Dressings included Dermabond (DER), Prineo (PRI), Histoacryl (HIS), Sylke (SYL), Steri-Strips (STE), and combinations (COM). Contralateral breasts in oncoplastic or free-flap cases were excluded. Results 250 patients (439 breasts) were included. At baseline, cohorts differed in BMI, ASA, diabetes, operative time, and resection weight (all p<0.05), largely due to PRI, which contained higher-risk patients. Analyses were repeated, excluding PRI: differences resolved. On univariate analysis, PRI had the highest complication rates. Excluding PRI, HIS had higher skin reaction rates than SYL (p=0.003) and COM (p=0.049), and higher dehiscence than SYL (p=0.043). On multivariate analysis, SYL predicted lower skin reaction (OR 0.21, p=0.003) and dehiscence (OR 0.47, p=0.02). PRI predicted higher reoperation (OR 6.4, p=0.01) and poor scarring (OR 34.8, p<0.001), though limited by baseline confounding. Conclusions Dressing selection may affect wound outcomes after reduction mammoplasty. Sylke tape was associated with lower rates of skin reaction and dehiscence across both analyses, though potentially limited by residual confounding. Prineo’s association with reoperation and poor scarring is notable but difficult to disentangle from patient selection bias. Combination dressings showed lower skin reaction rates but were heterogeneous, making interpretation challenging. Prospective data are needed to confirm these findings.
Reference Key
openalex_W7166095448 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Steven L. Zeng, Thomas Ren, Ricardo C Rodriguez, Nina E Ringelman, Salman Choudhry, Gedge Rosson
Journal Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/asjof/ojag131
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojag131
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.