Multimodal Approach for Lower Leg Liposculpture: A Case Series and Lessons Learned

Clicks: 3
ID: 318867
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #44 of 81 articles by views in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Lower leg lipodystrophy can be distressing to patients. Liposuction can contour the ankle, calf, and medial knee areas, but requires understanding of anatomy, thorough preoperative evaluation and diligent postoperative care. Objectives Prior studies focus on single liposuction techniques. We present a preliminary report using a multimodal technique for lower leg liposculpture for aesthetic lower leg contouring and discuss lessons learned. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients undergoing bilateral liposculpture contouring using a combination of laser, power-assisted, and fine-cannula liposuction of the ankles and calves with or without medial knee contouring between 2021 and 2025. Patients undergoing unilateral procedures, revision surgery, or surgery for lipedema were excluded, as were cases involving liposuction limited to the ankles or knees. Results Of 40 cases undergoing lower leg liposuction procedures, 30 involved liposculpture of the ankles, calves and medial knees. Average lipoaspirate was 793 ± 418 cc (range 300-2700 cc) from each leg. Mean operative duration was 115 ± 33 minutes (range 72-200 minutes), including concurrent procedures. Mean follow-up was 4.2 ± 4.3 months (range 1 week - 20.5 months). Three patients experienced complications, one developing skin hyperpigmentation, one scar thickening, and one pressure injury with cellulitis and prolonged edema. Conclusions Application of lower leg liposuction has been limited by concerns about complications. We present a multimodal approach to lower leg liposculpture. With appropriate preoperative assessment, patient counseling, and postoperative care, this approach can improve lower leg aesthetics with limited adverse events.
Reference Key
openalex_W7166133896 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Libby R. Copeland‐Halperin, Lauren O’Brien, Michelle Copeland
Journal Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/asjof/ojag134
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojag134
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.