Reforming Medicare Payment for Skin Substitutes — Ripping Off the Bandage

Clicks: 1
ID: 318720
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #82 of 93 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract In January 2026, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented a major overhaul of Medicare reimbursement for skin substitutes in an effort to curb runaway spending. Between 2019-2024, annual Medicare Part B spending on these products increased more than 40-fold, from $250 million to >$10 billion. Prior to the recent reform, CMS reimbursed clinicians for skin substitutes administered in non-facility settings (e.g., physician offices and patient homes) at rate of average sales price +6% at the average sales price (ASP) plus 6%. However, skin substitute manufacturers were. ally omitted from federal ASP reporting requirements. Some manufacturers and clinicians exploited this exemption to enter spread pricing arrangements, whereby clinicians profited on substantial differences between Medicare reimbursement (calculated based on undiscounted list prices) and actual acquisition costs. The newly implemented payment policy eliminates the potential for spread pricing by setting a flat, site-neutral payment rate. In 2027, CMS intends to establish a 3-tiered payment system for skin substitute products based on US Food and Drug Administration regulatory classification. While these reforms represent a critical step forward, additional measures—such as bundled reimbursement, expanded prior authorization, and evidence-based coverage policies—may be necessary to ensure sustainable and effective wound care.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165858416 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jad F Zeitouni, Xiaodan Hu, Sanket S. Dhruva, Joseph S. Ross, Vinay K. Rathi
Journal Health Affairs Scholar
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/haschl/qxag164
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.