Geographic and Socioeconomic Variation in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery Pricing Across the United States: A State-Level Analysis of Income, GDP, and Real Economic Burden
Clicks: 1
ID: 318231
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #58 of 81 articles by views in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Aesthetic surgery represents a major sector of direct patient payments in the United States. Despite the economic significance of this patient-funded market, systematic evidence on geographic pricing patterns and their socioeconomic determinants remains limited. Objectives To characterize geographic variation in advertised prices for common aesthetic surgery procedures across US metropolitan areas and evaluate their relationship with regional economic indicators and purchasing power. Methods Advertised prices for six common aesthetic procedures were analyzed across 100 US metropolitan areas, yielding 600 city–procedure observations. Price dispersion was quantified using descriptive statistics and coefficients of variation (CV). State-level mean prices were correlated with per capita personal income and gross domestic product (GDP). Nominal prices were further adjusted for regional cost of living using Regional Price Parities (RPP) to estimate real economic costs. Results Mean advertised prices ranged from USD 6,234 for liposuction to USD 14,639 for facelift procedures, with facelifts demonstrating the greatest dispersion (CV 38.8%). State-level analysis (n = 33) revealed a significant association between per capita personal income and procedure prices (r = 0.529, p = 0.0016). Adjustment for Regional Price Parities altered price rankings: New York remained the most expensive state, whereas Michigan and Kentucky ranked second and third in real cost, surpassing California. The affordability gap was substantial, with a single average procedure consuming nearly 20% of annual per capita income in Kentucky compared with approximately 10–11% in higher-income states. Conclusions Pricing for aesthetic procedures in the United States demonstrates marked geographic stratification. After accounting for regional purchasing power, the real economic burden of aesthetic procedures is often greater in lower-income states, indicating that regional wealth and purchasing power play a central role in shaping access within the patient-funded aesthetic surgery market.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7165548416
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ibrahim Güler, Gerrit Grieb, Armin Kraus, Henrik Stelling |
| Journal | Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/asjof/ojag125
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.