Health facilities as a lever for Birth Registration in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Realist Review

Clicks: 2
ID: 318015
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #66 of 66 articles by views in Health policy and planning

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The health system has been identified as a key lever for increasing access to birth registration (BR) directly after birth. BR is critical for upholding human rights and accessing essential services, yet many low- and middle-income countries struggle with low BR rates. In this realist synthesis, we reviewed literature on two separate interventions that are designed to increase access to BR services. This included (1) embedding or appointing an official to register births in health facilities and (2) incorporating education on BR in routine perinatal care programmes. This study aimed to support the knowledge base on how these interventions work, why, and for whom, within health facility contexts. We followed the RAMESES I publication guidelines for realist syntheses. Iterative searches were carried out in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science. The search also included grey literature, policy documents and insights from a key informant in South Africa. We adopted an iterative cycle of searches guided by review team exchanges, stakeholders' insights and sequential snowballing searches for theory and background information. We developed two initial programme theories, presented as ICAMO configurations, that were then refined against empirical evidence from 17 included studies, with publication dates ranging from 1992 to 2021. Our review findings highlight that the interventions improved BR rates by lowering logistical barriers, raising awareness and supporting BR staff, (i.e., personnel responsible for conducting BR within health facilities). Literature from LMICs suggest that the effectiveness of facility-level BR interventions is often affected by access to care, travel distances, transportation costs, as well as by the availability of resources, BR infrastructure, and staff motivation within healthcare facilities. These factors may, in turn, affect BR demand, parents' self-efficacy, and the extent to which BR initiatives align with parents' real-life contexts.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165201365 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Lisanne Wolsink, Zakaria Belrhiti, Wiedaad Slemming, Matty Crone, Marsha Orgill
Journal Health policy and planning
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/heapol/czag078
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.