Safety Culture and Attitudes Among Spine Professionals: Results of an International Survey.

Clicks: 283
ID: 31774
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #5 of 8 articles by views in global spine journal

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
International survey.A positive safety culture has been linked to better surgical outcomes, less hospital costs and less patient harm and severity-adjusted mortality, making safety attitudes relevant for society and both patient and health care provider. The aim of the current study is to assess attitudes toward safety culture among spinal care professionals.An online survey was distributed to members of AOSpine International in 2016. The survey consisted out of 3 parts: (1) demographics, (2) the Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ), and (3) expectations of responsibility for improving the safety culture. The SAQ measured job satisfaction, teamwork, and safety climate, perceptions of management, stress recognition, and working conditions. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with safety attitudes.A total of 356 respondents replied. The SAQ showed that respondents in Africa have a significant lower score (odds ratio [OR] 0.19, < .05) on working conditions, compared with spine professionals in Asia. Respondents in North America had the highest odds of having a higher score (OR 4.04, < .05) compared with respondents in Asia. Gender, continent, occupation, tenure, and the number of employees in the clinic were not associated with the dimensions of safety culture ( > .05). The majority expected the surgeon to be mainly responsible for improving the safety culture in the operating room and at management level.There was a lot of variety among different respondents worldwide albeit respondents in Africa scored significantly lower on working conditions, compared with spine professionals in Asia and North America, suggesting that wealthier countries have better working conditions which may lead toward better safety attitudes. Closer collaboration between hospital management and clinicians seems to be a target for improvement in safety culture. Furthermore, to show clinical relevance in this field, studies correlating safety attitudes with outcomes after spine surgery are warranted.
Reference Key
gadjradj2019safetyglobal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Gadjradj, Pravesh S;Harhangi, Biswadjiet S;
Journal global spine journal
Year 2019
DOI
10.1177/2192568218825247
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.