Ultra-processed foods and incident type 2 diabetes: Analysis of the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos (HCHS/SOL)

Clicks: 1
ID: 317673
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #283 of 304 articles by views in american journal of epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 304 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We assessed associations of total and group-specific ultra-processed food (UPF) intake with type 2 diabetes (T2D) incidence in the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos, overall and with a priori stratification by Hispanic/Latino heritage, US nativity, BMI categories, and diet quality measured by tertiles of the Alternative Healthy Eating Index (AHEI). Data entailed 8010 adults, completing follow-up (2014-17), and without baseline (2008-11) diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and/or cancer (mean follow-up: 5.8 years). Baseline 24-h dietary recalls and food propensity questionnaires assessed UPF intakes (% of diet weight) defined by the Nova framework. Self-report, anti-diabetes medications, and standard biomarker thresholds defined incident T2D. Poisson models adjusted for sociodemographic, acculturation, lifestyle, energy intake, and diabetes family history variables estimated incidence rate ratios (95% CI) of T2D per 10-percentage-point increase in total UPF intake and 1-SD increase in inverse normal transformed UPF group intakes. UPF constituted 19.8% of diet weight. Each 10-percentage-point increase in UPF was associated with 1.16 (1.01-1.34) higher T2D incidence overall (1273 cases). In stratified analyses, associations remained only for Puerto Ricans (1.22; 1.01-1.47), US-born persons (1.26; 1.03-1.54), and those with overweight/obesity (1.16; 1.01-1.35). Regarding UPF groups, artificially-sweetened beverages and processed poultry/fish were associated with a higher incidence of T2D in the overall sample. Among Puerto Ricans, US-born participants, and persons in the lowest AHEI tertile, ultra-processed bread/cereals, soft drinks, poultry/fish, and hard liquors were associated with a higher incidence of T2D, whereas ultra-processed sweet snacks, desserts, and spreads and savory snacks were associated with lower incidence. Limiting UPF is associated with lower T2D incidence among US Hispanics/Latinos, particularly Puerto Rican and US-born. Attention to group-specific UPF intake is warranted.
Reference Key
openalex_W7165039194 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kenny Mendoza, Abrania Marrero, Martha Tamez, Alan Espinosa, Daniela Sotres‐Alvarez, Amanda C. McClain, Christina Cordero, Tali Elfassy, Krista M Perreira, Yasmin Mossavar‐Rahmani, Qibin Qi, Martha Daviglus, Linda Van Horn, F M Hu, Walter C. Willett, Robert C. Kaplan, Josiemer Mattei
Journal american journal of epidemiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/aje/kwag139
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.