Data After Death: Post-Mortem Ethics of Burn Patient Records and Images
Clicks: 1
ID: 317251
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #57 of 71 articles by views in journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Burn care frequently relies on extensive documentation, including graphic photographic images and detailed clinical records. While these materials are essential for diagnosis, treatment planning, and research, their use after a patient's death raises complex ethical questions. The emergence of new technologies such as artificial intelligence training, alongside the increased visibility of burn images in education and public health campaigns, challenges traditional notions of confidentiality and consent. This narrative review examines the ethical boundaries of using burn patient records and images post-mortem, with a focus on emerging concerns around digital remains and posthumous consent. A narrative review of peer-reviewed literature, professional guidelines, and position statements published between 2000 and 2025 was conducted. Sources included PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, using search terms such as "burn injuries," "medical photography," "post-mortem consent," "digital remains," and "medical ethics." Relevant publications addressing clinical practice, teaching, research, and social media use in burn care were synthesized to identify key ethical themes and gaps. The literature reveals that while ethical frameworks for consent, privacy, and confidentiality are well established during life, guidance becomes inconsistent once the patient has died. A small but growing body of scholarship identifies posthumous privacy as an emerging domain of bioethics. Across studies, concerns included dignity after death, risks of re-identification on digital platforms, and the absence of explicit patient directives regarding posthumous use of images and data. Current medical guidelines provide minimal direction, leaving ambiguity for clinicians and researchers. The ethical use of burn patient images and records after death remains underexplored, particularly in the context of AI training datasets and social media awareness campaigns. The absence of consensus underscores the need for professional societies to establish clearer policies and protocols that honor patient dignity beyond life. Establishing standards for posthumous consent will help clinicians, educators, and researchers navigate the evolving landscape of digital medicine responsibly.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7164650484
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Joshua Khorsandi, Brian Mansoury, Liahm Blank, Abu-Bakr Ahmed, Samir Alkhouri, Kathryn Cataldo, Joshua MacDavid |
| Journal | journal of burn care & research : official publication of the american burn association |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jbcr/irag097
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.