THE AUTHENTICITY OF JOHN OWEN’S TWELFTH BOOK OF EPIGRAMS

Clicks: 8
ID: 317230
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #4 of 10 articles by views in in the library with the lead pipe

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
John Owen (1564–1622) was the most widely circulated Anglo-Latin poet of the seventeenth century. Between 1606 and 1612, he published ten books of Latin epigrams. From 1615, a spurious eleventh book, in fact by Michele Verino, was often added. From 1628 an appendix or twelfth book attributed to Owen began to appear. Although this twelfth book has largely been ignored by scholars and excluded from authoritative editions, this article uses surviving manuscripts to demonstrate that twenty-seven of the epigrams are certainly by Owen. This demonstrates the importance of considering manuscript as well as print evidence when attributing authorship of early-modern Latin verse. Owen has usually been treated only as a poet of print. This article is the first full consideration of the role of Owen’s surviving presentation manuscripts, and as such, casts his literary career in a new light.
Reference Key
openalex_W7164641626 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Victoria Moul
Journal in the library with the lead pipe
Year 2026
DOI
10.3828/library.2026.27.2.233
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.