Revisiting Total Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: Technical Refinements for Improved Outcomes

Clicks: 1
ID: 317216
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #81 of 81 articles by views in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Background Although prepectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction has gained increasing popularity, it is not suitable for all patients. Subpectoral reconstruction remains necessary in selected cases, yet traditional techniques are limited by animation deformity and restricted lower pole expansion. Objectives To evaluate the safety, reproducibility, and clinical outcomes of a refined, mesh-free total subpectoral reconstruction technique. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 119 patients (181 breasts) undergoing immediate implant-based reconstruction using a standardized subpectoral technique. Key anatomical structures—including the inframammary ligament, serratus anterior fascia, and intercostal perforators—were preserved. Controlled fascial releases and limited superior dissection were employed to optimize implant positioning and lower pole expansion. Outcomes included complication rates, revision surgery, and BREAST-Q scores. Results The mean follow-up was 28.1 months. Minor complications occurred in 28.6% of cases, while major complications were observed in 6.7%. Hematoma, infection, and implant-related complications remained within the lower range of reported literature values. Revision surgery was required in 7.6% of patients, primarily due to contour irregularities, all successfully managed with single-stage correction. Among 100 patients completing BREAST-Q assessment, the mean score was 76.6 ± 15.1. Conclusions This refined mesh-free total subpectoral technique provides stable implant positioning, improved lower pole projection, and reduced animation deformity. In appropriately selected patients, it represents a safe, reproducible, and cost-effective alternative to conventional submuscular approaches.
Reference Key
openalex_W7164674388 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Buse Fatma Çapkınoğlu, Ahmet Umut Yuvacı, Akın Yücel
Journal Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/asjof/ojag111
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojag111
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.