Semantic Neutrality
Clicks: 6
ID: 317137
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
6 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #6 of 12 articles by views in Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract My topic here is semantic neutrality. In what interesting ways can language—or the meanings of particular expressions—be, or fail to be, neutral? Talk of neutrality might be developed in different directions. I critically discuss some different conceptions. Some of the discussion will concern the idea that it is an important desideratum on a semantic theory that it respect a particular kind of neutrality constraint.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7164502493
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Matti Eklund |
| Journal | Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/arisup/akag007
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.