Implementing Antipsychotic Reduction in Long-Term Care: Interdisciplinary and Lived-Experience Insights into System-Level Barriers and Facilitators
Clicks: 2
ID: 317102
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #139 of 155 articles by views in the gerontologist
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 155 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background and Objectives Despite the availability of evidence-based antipsychotic reduction strategies, implementation of these strategies in long-term care (LTC) often stalls. Understanding how change occurs in real-world practice requires perspectives from interdisciplinary team members. This study interviewed interdisciplinary team members, a family caregiver, and a person living with dementia in LTC in Vancouver, Canada, to explore how they operationalize antipsychotic reduction in LTC homes and examine their perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation. Research Design and Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 participants: 18 interdisciplinary healthcare providers, one dementia advocate, and one family caregiver. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. To preserve inductive insights, the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was applied post hoc to the emergent themes. We examined the extent to which the findings were aligned with the CFIR, thereby deepening the analysis. Results Identified strategies included person-centred care planning, non-pharmacological interventions, medication review with behaviour monitoring, and education. Barriers were: (1) challenging work environments, (2) safety concerns and unconscious dismissive attitudes, and (3) communication gaps. Facilitators included: (1) supportive leadership and frontline champions, (2) team communication, and (3) persistence. Each factor aligns with different CFIR constructs and domains to varying degrees. Discussion and Implications The main contribution of this study is that, drawing on CRIF, it found barriers to antipsychotic reduction in LTC are not merely individual but also systemic. Sustained improvement depends on policies that enable and resource effective interdisciplinary teamwork. This includes adequate staffing, education, team communication, and culture change.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7164496722
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Karen Lok Yi Wong, Lillian Hung, Jason Wong, Adebusola Adekoya, Joey Oi Yee Wong, Erika Young, Cromwell Acosta, Krisztina Vàsàrhelyi |
| Journal | the gerontologist |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/geront/gnag126
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.