ClinAgent: AI-Assisted Methodology for Clinical Trial Data Processing and Statistical Programming
Clicks: 1
ID: 316994
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #13 of 20 articles by views in Biology Methods and Protocols
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Clinical trial statistical programming requires 12 to 24 full-time-equivalent months per Phase 3 study and remains a bottleneck in pharmaceutical research. Modern artificial intelligence coding agents reason capably but lack domain-specific tools: they cannot read proprietary statistical software datasets, parse analysis specifications, or generate standards-compliant code without extensive guidance. We present ClinAgent, a skill and tool layer that augments any artificial intelligence coding agent with clinical programming capabilities through Model Context Protocol tools. Its design separates minimal data access from rich domain logic: skills package prompts, rule engines, and decision trees encoding expert knowledge, while tools provide stateless input-output for statistical software datasets, spreadsheet specifications, and log files. In this single-study proof-of-concept evaluation, we validate ClinAgent’s nine skills on artifacts from a production Phase 2 cardiovascular study, with synthetic datasets spanning 13 analysis domains and 102,109 observations. All skills pass functional validation. On this small sample, deterministic components identify one error and seven warnings without false positives and match all 56 subject-level variables; corresponding confidence intervals are wide, so these point estimates should be read as upper bounds pending replication. Prompt-based specification generation, dependent on the underlying language model, reaches 72.1 percent derivation accuracy overall, above 96 percent in simple domains and below 55 percent in complex ones, indicating that generated specifications require expert review. Our contributions include an agent-augmentation architecture, nine validated skills, tool implementations for clinical data formats, and a validation methodology distinguishing deterministic tool correctness from language-model-dependent output.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7164334625
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | J. Yan |
| Journal | Biology Methods and Protocols |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/biomethods/bpag032
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.