Comments on Gregory Currie’s ‘Art as the Manifestation of Agency’
Clicks: 4
ID: 316977
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.9
/100
4 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #11 of 12 articles by views in Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Gregory Currie’s claim that art manifests artists’ skilful activity is given sympathetic examination. The scope of the claim is considered, as well as the sense in which it invokes a personal connection to the artist. Currie’s information-focused account of the value of manifestation profiles is extended to encompass engagement with art that may not share information bearing accepted value. The significance of sheer connection to the object worked on by the artist is explored, with reference to Benjaminian aura and pressing Currie’s comparison of humanly and mechanically made copies.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7164354253
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Eileen John |
| Journal | Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/arisup/akag001
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.