Causal Beliefs and the Potential for Political Backlash Against AI
Clicks: 24
ID: 316942
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
6.9
/100
24 views
8 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #16 of 48 articles by views in public opinion quarterly
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Artificial intelligence is poised to reconfigure the economy and politics. Although new technologies often produce net economic gains, their costs and benefits are unequally distributed, making them susceptible to politicization. We argue that whether and how AI becomes mobilized for partisan gain will depend on the public’s causal beliefs about the winners and losers of AI. We categorize these causal beliefs into four types using a novel survey instrument fielded with approximately 6,000 Americans and Canadians. Using latent class analysis, we show that while some respondents are supportive of AI, a significant portion of the public theorizes it as a threat—harming consumers and replacing rather than complementing workers’ skills. These beliefs are aligned with political preferences, predicting support for policies that delay job loss over those that help workers adapt, and polarizing voters along existing partisan lines. We conclude that fissures in the public’s attitudes toward AI already exist and are primed for exploitation by political entrepreneurs.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7164408166
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sophie Borwein, Beatrice Magistro, R Michael Alvarez, Bart Bonikowski, Peter John Loewen |
| Journal | public opinion quarterly |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/poq/nfag033
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.