From Nose Job to a Better Job: A Scoping Review of Facial Aesthetics, Attractiveness Bias, and Outcomes in the Workplace
Clicks: 1
ID: 316373
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #72 of 81 articles by views in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Facial appearance strongly influences professional and social outcomes, with individuals perceived as more attractive often receiving increased job opportunities—a phenomenon known as “attractiveness bias.” As facial plastic surgery becomes increasingly common, its potential impact on workplace dynamics and ethics warrants evaluation. Objectives To synthesize current evidence examining the relationship between facial aesthetic surgery, attractiveness bias, psychosocial outcomes, and professional trajectories. Methods A comprehensive search of the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Cochrane Library, SCOPUS, and PsycINFO was conducted (inception-September 10, 2025) according to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Controlled vocabulary (MeSH) and free-text terms related to facial aesthetic surgery, career outcomes, and attractiveness bias were combined. Studies were included if they examined surgical facial aesthetic or reconstructive procedures and assessed self-perception, attractiveness bias, professional or socioeconomic outcomes, or appearance-related psychological distress. Results Sixty-one studies met inclusion criteria and were synthesized qualitatively into three conceptual domains. Across studies, facial aesthetic surgery consistently enhanced both self-perception and external evaluations. Postoperative images were rated as more attractive, trustworthy, competent, and intelligent than preoperative images. Patients reported improved self-esteem and social functioning, with several studies identifying career advancement as a key motivator. In contrast, individuals with facial trauma, congenital malformations, or features diverging from cultural beauty norms reported discrimination and lower levels of overall satisfaction. Rates of body dysmorphic disorder among surgical candidates ranged from 2.5% to 32%. Conclusions Facial aesthetic surgery may influence professional outcomes by modifying self-confidence and how others perceive competence. Plastic surgeons should recognize workplace-related motivations during consultation and incorporate ethical counseling to ensure informed decision-making. Further longitudinal research is needed to clarify whether cosmetic enhancement leads to tangible increased earnings.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7163878494
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Justin L Anderson, Joey Liang, Jackson Cathey, Jessica Berns, Samantha Kaplan, Ashit Patel |
| Journal | Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/asjof/ojag104
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.