Innocent but in a cell? Challenging custodial remand in England and Wales
Clicks: 3
ID: 316355
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.6
/100
3 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #7 of 36 articles by views in Significance
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Sheila M. Bird analyses the costly and unfair use of remand to prison custody in England and Wales for persons who ultimately do not receive a custodial sentence – including those who are not guilty or not proceeded against
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (39 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7163889624
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Sheila M. Bird |
| Journal | Significance |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jrssig/qmag042
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.