The storytelling fallacy in methodological research
Clicks: 2
ID: 316349
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.3
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #15 of 36 articles by views in Significance
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Using real data examples from methodological research, Maximilian Mandl, Mathilde Dicaire-Cartier, Tobias Woehrle, Frank Weber and Anne-Laure Boulesteix highlight the perils of presenting a method's performance in the most flattering light using real data examples
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (36 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7163927148
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Maximilian M. Mandl, Mathilde Dicaire-Cartier, Tobias Woehrle, Frank Weber, Anne‐Laure Boulesteix |
| Journal | Significance |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jrssig/qmag046
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.