Relative efficiencies of Maximum Likelihood, Minimum CHI-Square, And Minimum B Estimators.

Clicks: 2
ID: 316304
2003
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #172 of 182 articles by views in Journal of Statistics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 182 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Debate on the choice between maximum likelihood estimator and minimum chi-square estimator is Still on. Rao's school of thought advocates for the maximum likelihood estimator and Berkson's school of thought for the minimum chi-square estimator. In this paper a numerical study has boon made by computing the relative efficiency of these estimators together with that of minimum 13 estimator for the Exponential parameter. The study reveals that for few choices of 'A' and 'EV, the constants in Statistic B introduced by Khan and Baily (1987), the minimum El estimator is more efficient than the other Iwo. Also maximum likelihood estimator is more efficient than the minimum chi-square estimator
Reference Key
imported_1780934530_6a26e7824a8bc Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Masood Amjad Khan
Journal Journal of Statistics
Year 2003
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.