An Empirical Study of some Unequal Probability Sampling Estimators
Clicks: 3
ID: 316293
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #64 of 182 articles by views in Journal of Statistics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 182 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
An empirical study has been carried out to decide about the performance of various estimators used in unequal probability sampling without replacement and a sample of size 2. The Hansen–Hurwitz estimator and simple random sampling method has also been compared in this study. Some suggestions have been given at the end.
| Reference Key |
imported_1780934481_6a26e75135953
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Usman Ali Khan, Muhammad Qaiser Shahbaz |
| Journal | Journal of Statistics |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.