Comparison of Estimators in Case of Low Correlation in Adaptive Cluster Sampling
Clicks: 2
ID: 316194
2016
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #174 of 182 articles by views in Journal of Statistics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 182 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In this paper, two Regression-Cum-Exponential Estimators have been proposed to estimate the population mean using population mean of single auxiliary variable in Adaptive Cluster Sampling. The expressions for the Mean Square Error and Bias of the proposed Estimators have been derived. A simulation study has been carried out to demonstrate and compare the efficiencies and precisions of the Estimators. The proposed Estimators have been compared with Ratio, Regression, Exponential Ratio Estimators in usual sampling, the Hansen-Hurwitz and the Ratio Estimators in Adaptive Cluster Sampling when there is low positive correlation between study variable and auxiliary variable.
| Reference Key |
imported_1780934164_6a26e6144589c
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Muhammad Shahzad Chaudhry, Muhammad Hanif |
| Journal | Journal of Statistics |
| Year | 2016 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.