Modified Method for Choosing Ridge Parameter
Clicks: 3
ID: 316179
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.6
/100
3 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #66 of 182 articles by views in Journal of Statistics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 182 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Multicollinearity occurs when two or more predictors are linearly related to each other. In this case, either OLS estimators do not exist or if exist the associated variances of estimated Regression co-efficients are very large, making inferences invalid. Ridge Regression is used to counter the effects of multicollinearity. This is done by introducing biasing constant k, called Ridge parameter in the least square objective function. Ridge parameter shrinks the estimates and their variances. Selection and choice of the unknown Ridge parameter k is of prime importance in Ridge Regression analysis. Khalaf et al. (2013) proposed some modifications of existing Ridge estimators – by multiplying them with the factor that make use of maximum eigenvalue associated with ( ) matrix and name resulting estimators as K1M– K16M. This study proposed some modifications of existing Ridge estimators – by multiplying them with the factor that make use of arithmetic mean of eigenvalues associated with ( ) matrix denoted as K1A–K16A. The comparative performance of proposed sets of estimators and Khalaf et al. (2013) was evaluated by Mean Square Error (MSE) using simulated data sets. Data sets considering different levels of collinearity (r), sample size (n), number of predictor (p), error term variances and error term distributions were generated. It was observed that proposed estimators K1A–K16A outperform K1M–K16M when error terms following normal distribution ( = 0.1, 1) collinearity levels (r) are (i.e. 0.80, 0.90, 0.95) and number of predictors are (i.e. 2, 4, 6) and when error terms following non-normal distribution (F (4, 20)) collinearity levels (r) are high (i.e. 0.80, 0.90, 0.95) and number of predictors are small (i.e. 2, 4).
| Reference Key |
imported_1780934125_6a26e5ed7eed6
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ayan Ullah, Muhammad Suhail and Maryam Ilyas |
| Journal | Journal of Statistics |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.