The Power of Compassion-Seeking: How Enforcement Officers’ Discursive Strategies Foster Citizens’Cooperative Responses Under Policy Ambiguity

Clicks: 51
ID: 316126
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #21 of 49 articles by views in journal of public administration research and theory

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Street-level bureaucrats (SLBs) often employ compassion-seeking strategies when interacting with citizens under ambiguous policy conditions. However, citizens’ responses to these strategies remain largely unexplored. This study thus examines whether SLBs’ compassion-seeking strategies promote inspectees’ cooperative responses under policy ambiguity. We conducted survey experiments using four real-world enforcement scenarios across emergency and routine regulatory contexts in China. The results show that SLBs’ compassion-seeking strategies significantly increase inspectees’ willingness to comply, acceptance of enforcement, emotional compassion towards SLBs, and supportive intentions. Furthermore, the effectiveness of compassion-seeking is stronger in emergency contexts than in routine regulatory contexts. The findings indicate that compassion-seeking is a context-sensitive and underappreciated mechanism through which SLBs can reduce antagonism, establish constructive relationships, and enhance both the efficacy and perceived legitimacy of frontline enforcement.
Reference Key
openalex_W7163754041 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal journal of public administration research and theory
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/jopart/muag012
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.