The impact of cash and near-cash social policies on substance use outcomes: A scoping review
Clicks: 2
ID: 316082
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
0.3
/100
2 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #45 of 93 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background The impact of government financial assistance and substance use is contested by two competing hypotheses: the “income effect” posits that cash transfers could facilitate substance consumption, while the “stress-relief hypothesis” posits that cash transfers alleviate poverty-related stress that contributes to substance use. Methods We conducted a scoping review of 46 studies (2000-2025) evaluating U.S. cash and near-cash safety net programs on substance use outcomes, following PRISMA-ScR guidance. Results Evidence was most robust for tax credits, the Earned Income Tax Credit and Child Tax Credit, reducing tobacco use, particularly among lower-educated mothers. Evidence was suggestive but design-limited for Unemployment Insurance buffering overdose mortality in contexts of job loss, as most studies were ecological. Findings on alcohol and opioid outcomes were generally limited or null. Restrictions in near-cash supports, including drug-felony bans on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, were associated with higher rates of opioid misuse and substance use disorders (SUDs). Disbursement design also mattered: lump-sum disability payments and synchronous COVID-era stimulus disbursements were linked to short-term spikes in overdose mortality (“check effect”), while stable, smaller benefits supported treatment retention. Conclusions The U.S. safety net plays a meaningful role in substance-related outcomes, with evidentiary strength varying considerably by program and substance.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7163747283
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Maria Olívia Pozzolo Pedro, Nidhi Binoy, Dylanis López Ruiz, Sam D Gardner, Shota W Hasui, Megan E. Marziali, Emilie Bruzelius, Priscila D Gonçalves, Esther Rowan, Pia M. Mauro, Jamie R Daw, Morgan M. Philbin, Silvia S Martins |
| Journal | Health Affairs Scholar |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/haschl/qxag145
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.