Can mobile phone surveys accurately measure the coverage of maternal healthcare services? Results from the Rapid Mortality Mobile Phone Survey (RaMMPS) study in Mozambique

Clicks: 1
ID: 316041
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #3 of 5 articles by views in Oxford Open Digital Health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic raised the need for rapid approaches for measuring population-based health indicators to understand its impact on service utilization, while avoiding face-to-face interviews. The Rapid Mortality Mobile Phone Surveys (RaMMPS) aimed to test the use of mobile phone surveys (MPS) for measuring maternal health services coverage in Mozambique by comparing estimates to the nationally representative Demographic Health Survey 2022 (DHS 2022). RaMMPS used two strategies: 1) subsampling from existing national sample registration system, Countrywide Mortality Surveillance for Action (COMSA); 2) Random Digit Dialing (RDD) of randomly generated phone numbers. We collected data from March to August 2022 for the COMSA MPS sample, and from June to December 2022 for the RDD sample. In both cases computer assisted telephone interviews were conducted among women aged 15-49 years. Women were asked questions on utilization of maternal health care (MHC) services for births within two years preceding the survey. We compared adjusted MHC coverage estimates between each RaMMPS sample and the DHS 2022. Despite adjustment to redress the MPS samples, MHC coverage was higher in MPS samples compared to the DHS-2022 sample. The coverage of at least one antenatal care visit was 99% (95%CI: 98-99) in COMSA MPS and 98% (95%CI: 95-99) in RDD samples compared to 81% (95%CI: 79-84) in the DHS-2022 sample. Additionally, coverage of at least four antenatal care visits was 76% (95%CI: 73-80) in COMSA MPS and 85% (95%CI: 81-88) in RDD samples, compared to 48% (95%CI: 45-51) in the DHS-2022. Coverage of health facility delivery was 87% (95%CI: 84-90) in COMSA MPS and 90% (95%CI: 85-93) in RDD samples compared to 40% (95%CI: 38-62) in the DHS 2022. Similarly, skilled birth attendant coverage was 86% (95%CI: 82-89) and 88% (95%CI: 84-92) respectively in COMSA MPS and RDD samples compared to 48% (95%CI: 46-49) in the DHS 2022. MHC coverage measured through MPS were consistently overestimated compared to nationally representative surveys, even after adjustments.
Reference Key
openalex_W7163689167 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Helen Kuo, Almamy Malick Kanté, Cremildo Manhiça, Celso Monjane, Aveika Akum, Fred Van Dyk, Nordino Machava, Azarias Mulungo, Ivalda Macicame, Agbessi Amouzou
Journal Oxford Open Digital Health
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/oodh/oqag011
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.