Pathogenesis of Male Genital Lichen Sclerosus: Autoimmunity versus the Urine/Occlusion Hypothesis – A Narrative Review

Clicks: 1
ID: 316039
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #129 of 172 articles by views in clinical and experimental dermatology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 172 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Male genital lichen sclerosus (MGLSc) is a chronic inflammatory dermatosis with significant morbidity, yet its pathogenesis remains incompletely understood. Two main hypotheses have emerged: an autoimmune model, and the urine/occlusion hypothesis, specific to male genital anatomy. This narrative review critically analyses evidence supporting each paradigm. Epidemiological data reveal that autoimmune comorbidities occur significantly less frequently in men with MGLSc than in women with vulvar disease, with some studies reporting prevalence no higher than general population rates. Histopathologically, cytotoxic CD8+ and CD57+ T-lymphocyte infiltration suggests immune-mediated tissue injury, yet extracellular matrix protein 1 autoantibodies show no significant seroreactivity in males. Conversely, the urine/occlusion hypothesis is supported by the near-universal association of MGLSc with intact foreskin, high prevalence of post-micturition micro-incontinence, anatomical mapping demonstrating disease concentration in maximally occluded preputial regions, and case series showing disease resolution following urinary diversion and induction at urostomy sites. Microbiome studies demonstrate convergence between balanopreputial and urinary microbial communities in affected patients, while molecular evidence shows urea-induced fibroblast changes consistent with fibrogenesis. Recent transcriptomic analyses identifying distinct molecular subtypes suggest heterogeneity, with autoimmune mechanisms potentially operative in only a subset of patients. The evidence reviewed supports urine exposure and occlusion as the predominant pathogenic drivers in most MGLSc cases, with autoimmune phenomena likely representing secondary responses to tissue injury rather than primary etiological mechanisms.
Reference Key
openalex_W7163691246 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Andrei Tanasov, George-Sorin Tiplica
Journal clinical and experimental dermatology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ced/llag237
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.