Target Trial Emulation of Alcohol Intake Interventions in Young Adults and Risk of CVD over 30 years: Data from the CARDIA study

Clicks: 1
ID: 315861
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #193 of 196 articles by views in european journal of preventive cardiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 196 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Structured Abstract Aim This study uses a target trial emulation framework to estimate how different hypothetical sustained alcohol intake patterns affect 30-year cardiovascular disease risk in young adults. Methods This target trial emulation used longitudinal data from the CARDIA study, a multi-site cohort of Black and White young adults aged 18–30 at baseline (1985–1986), followed for 35 years. The exposure of this study consisted of self-reported daily alcohol intake categorized by sex into abstainer, light, moderate, heavy, and very heavy use categories. The emulated intervention compared hypothetical scenarios in which participants maintained consistent levels of alcohol consumption over time (assigned each of the 5 categories above) to estimate their long-term cardiovascular risk. Using the parametric g-formula to account for time-varying confounding and treatment–confounder feedback, we then estimated the 30-year incident risk of the composite cardiovascular outcome. Results Over 30 years, the overall CVD risk among all participants was 8.7%. Abstaining was associated with a slightly lower risk (8.3%; risk difference [RD] –0.4%; 95% CI, –0.6 to 0.1), while light (8.8%; RD 0.2%; 95% CI, –0.1 to 0.2) and moderate (9.4%; RD 0.7%; 95% CI, –0.1 to 0.9) drinking showed minimal risk differences. Heavy (RD 1.3%; 95% CI, –0.2 to 1.8) and very heavy drinking (RD 1.9%; 95% CI, –0.3 to 2.9) suggested modestly increased risks, though confidence intervals included no effect. Conclusion This hypothetical intervention indicates no meaningful difference in 30-year CVD risk among abstainers, light, or moderate drinkers in young adults. Heavy alcohol intake may modestly raise risk, but estimates are imprecise with a range from no effect to a modest increase. By addressing key biases and leveraging comprehensive longitudinal data, these findings offer valuable insights for clinical and public health guidance.
Reference Key
openalex_W7163575741 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Jiarui Li, Luohua Jiang, David S. Timberlake, Nathan D. Wong, David R. Jacobs, Andrew Odegaard
Journal european journal of preventive cardiology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/eurjpc/zwag302
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.