Closed Cohorts versus Open Borders: Travel Medicine Lessons from the Ebola and Andes Hantavirus outbreaks
Clicks: 1
ID: 315808
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #27 of 50 articles by views in international journal of travel medicine and global health
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Contrasting WHO responses to BDBV Ebola and the MV Hondius Andes virus cluster show that international outbreak risk depends not only on pathogen severity, but also on surveillance visibility, mobility-network traceability and healthcare-system resilience. Modern travel medicine preparedness must therefore prioritize containment capacity alongside pathogen-specific risk assessment.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7163383471
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Perry J J Genderen, Aisha Khatib, Jakrapun Pupaibool, Ralph Huits, Anna Bogacka, Maciej Grzybek |
| Journal | international journal of travel medicine and global health |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jtm/taag045
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.