Digital Tattoos in Infectious Diseases Management
Clicks: 2
ID: 315580
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #214 of 214 articles by views in Open forum infectious diseases
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 214 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract The widespread adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) has improved continuity and efficiency in healthcare; however, the permanence of digital documentation may unknowingly and unintentionally disadvantage patients. Certain infectious disease–related labels, particularly those denoting colonization of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) organisms, status of stigmatized diseases (HIV or sexually transmitted infections), or antibiotic drug allergy, frequently persist long after their clinical relevance has expired. These “Digital Tattoos” silently influence clinical decision-making and impose multifaceted burdens, leading to unnecessary isolation, excessive use of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, psychological distress, higher healthcare costs, and reinforcement of stigma. For example, penicillin allergy labels are a notable example: although most reported allergies wane over time, they continue to restrict optimal prescribing. A critical mismatch exists between static (unchanged) EMR records and the dynamic (changeable) nature of clinical conditions. To mitigate the harms of Digital Tattoos, we must urgently move beyond passive documentation toward proactive management of healthcare data, which integrates automated reassessment mechanisms and synchronized de-labeling protocols. Decoupling the permanence of digital records from systemic inequities in patient care hinges on the robust synthesis of digital humility and patient-oriented risk evaluation.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7163128963
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Hideharu Hagiya |
| Journal | Open forum infectious diseases |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/ofid/ofag338
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.