Haunted Modernities
Clicks: 2
ID: 315146
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Star Article
0.3
/100
2 views
1 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
StarRanked #2 of 5 articles by views in Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus.
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
In the complex landscape of post-Soviet transitions, infrastructure in Georgia has emerged as a crucial mediator of power, identity, and social dynamics. This article examines the diverse ways infrastructure shapes and is shaped by political, ecological, and affective processes in contemporary Georgia through ethnographic case studies from Tbilisi’s Mtkvari Riverfront, the resistance movement in the Rioni Valley, and informal scrap metal economies in Poti. Drawing on theoretical insights from the anthropology of infrastructure, the research illustrates how infrastructural formations transcend their materiality to become dynamic sites of ideological expression, contestation, and everyday survival. In Tbilisi, the transformation of the Mtkvari riverfront demonstrates how Soviet infrastructural legacies severed historical and ecological continuities, leaving behind landscapes marked by collective memory and estrangement. By contrast, the Rioni Valley emphasises infrastructure as a site of political formations, where locals actively challenge state-imposed development narratives and reclaim their relational linkages to land and water. In Poti, meanwhile, infrastructural ruination has encouraged informal economic practices and created novel socio-material forms of resilience amid systemic breakdown. These diverse responses to infrastructure underline the tensions that are integral to neoliberal changes and state-driven modernisation, which are especially visible in their neglect of local knowledge, adaptive resilience, and collective attachments. By highlighting the need to see infrastructure as relational, dynamic, and affectively charged matter, this paper attempts to illuminate how marginalised spaces can become active venues for negotiating sovereignty, memory, and possibilities for alternative futures in post-Soviet Georgia.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7162659502
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Lika Jalagania, Esma Berikishvili, Ketevan Lapachi, Mariam Urdia |
| Journal | Studies on Central Asia and the Caucasus. |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.36253/asiac-3524
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.