Audits and educational interventions improve endotracheal suctioning practices in the paediatric intensive care unit

Clicks: 1
ID: 314935
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #3 of 21 articles by views in IJQHC Communications

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Artificial airway suctioning can cause transient adverse events such as desaturation, bleeding, and hemodynamic changes, as well as longer-term consequences, such as mucosal injury and hospital-acquired infections. Practicing safe suctioning is therefore essential to optimise therapeutic outcomes. Methods This prospective quality improvement project was conducted in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit of a tertiary care hospital in South India, using the clinical audit framework. The aim was to assess and enhance compliance with evidence-based guidelines for endotracheal suctioning. Ten parameters essential for safe endotracheal suctioning were identified based on American Association of Respiratory Care (2022) guidelines and taking into consideration the departmental guidelines. A pro forma was used to document the suctioning practices as observed by visiting at different hours. The percentage compliance to set standards was calculated for each parameter. Post the first audit cycle, targeted interventions were implemented including sharing of structured learning modules with the critical care therapists, emphasising the importance of safe suctioning, as well as involving the Medical Gas Engineering Department to repair or replace the suction apparatus and pressure gauges found to be malfunctioning. A second audit cycle was conducted post-intervention and the results compared. Results Re-audit showed an increase in the compliance with use of appropriate negative pressure (<120 mmHg) during suctioning from 13% to 56%, and use of thumb control from 61% to 80%. There was a marginal increase in the number of beds with safe suction depth displayed at the bedside (70% to 72%). Conclusion The re-audit demonstrated an improvement in compliance with guidelines for safe suctioning, thus demonstrating that regular audits and educational interventions can positively influence clinical practice and contribute to improved patient care and safety. Sustaining these improvements may require periodic re-audits, continued on-boarding training for new staff and systemic support including timely maintenance of equipment.
Reference Key
openalex_W7162307842 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Anushka Kataria, Samson Godson, Lallu Joseph, Balaji Sankar, Kala Ebenezer
Journal IJQHC Communications
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ijcoms/lyag017
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.