Effectiveness and Safety of Extended Upadacitinib Induction Therapy in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Active Ulcerative Colitis

Clicks: 4
ID: 314555
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #4 of 38 articles by views in Crohn s & Colitis 360

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Responses to induction therapies for moderate-to-severe active ulcerative colitis (UC) are sufficient, but some patients benefit from prolonged induction to achieve clinical outcomes before transitioning to maintenance dosing. Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral JAK1 inhibitor, is approved in the US. for treatment of moderate-to-severe active UC non-responsive to anti-TNF therapy. However, standard 8-week induction regimen with UPA 45 mg/day may not be sufficient for some patients. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of extended UPA induction for moderate-to-severe active UC. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of adults with moderate-to-severe active UC who received UPA 45 mg/day beyond 8 weeks’ induction. Patients with disease-related complications and those lost-to follow-up data after extended induction were excluded. Primary endpoint was clinical response (partial Mayo score (PMS) reduction by ≥ 3). Secondary endpoints included clinical remission (PMS ≤ 2), endoscopic response (Mayo endoscopic score decrease by ≥ 1), improvement in fecal calprotectin (FC) to < 150 ug/dL, and specific adverse events. Results Nine patients were included for analysis. All patients previously failed ≥ 1 biologic therapy, and 5 failed ≥ 2 biologic therapies, of which 1 also failed tofacitinib. Duration of extended UPA induction ranged from 12-24 weeks. Clinical response rate was 78% (7/9) and FC improved to < 150 ug/dL in 71% (5/7). At the time of this report, 3 patients completed 12 weeks UPA induction but have not yet transitioned to maintenance therapy. Of these, 1 achieved clinical response, 1 achieved clinical remission, and 1 has planned colectomy for steroid-refractory UC. Five patients completed UPA extended induction (range 12-24 weeks) and transitioned to UPA 30 mg/day with stable clinical remission and FC < 150 ug/g. Finally, 1 patient discontinued UPA induction after 16 weeks due to non-response and underwent total proctocolectomy. Adverse events included dental abscess (n = 1) and mild COVID-19 infection (n = 2). No patients developed Herpes zoster, VTE, or MACE. Conclusion Our retrospective study suggests extended UPA induction, from 12-24 weeks, is effective in achieving clinical response/remission in patients with moderate-to-severe active UC with a tolerable safety profile. Our clinical response/remission rates are higher than that reported for extended induction in the U-ACCOMPLISH/U-ACHIEVE clinical trials. Larger studies and longer-term follow-up are needed to examine the efficacy and safety of this approach.
Reference Key
openalex_W7161948464 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Nabil El Hage Chehade, Tara Alleyasin, Bonnie Zagorski, Thien Nguyen, Nirmal Patel, Melissa Ferrari, Emily Singh, Mazer Ally, Rebecca Matro, Gauree G. Konijeti
Journal Crohn s & Colitis 360
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/crocol/otag044
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.