Safety of Augmentation Mastopexy in a Teaching Environment: Complication Analysis
Clicks: 1
ID: 314222
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #71 of 81 articles by views in Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Background Breast hypoplasia and ptosis, whether congenital or acquired, may significantly affect body image and quality of life. Augmentation mastopexy is an effective corrective procedure but is technically demanding and associated with a recognized risk of complications, raising concerns regarding its role in surgical training. Objectives To evaluate the incidence and type of complications following augmentation mastopexy performed by plastic surgery residents under direct attending supervision, and to assess the implications for training within an academic setting. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 289 consecutive augmentation mastopexy procedures performed between January 2020 and January 2024, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. All procedures were performed by residents under continuous supervision of experienced plastic surgeons. Data regarding patient characteristics, surgical technique, implant selection, and postoperative complications were collected and analyzed. Results Forty-six complications were recorded, corresponding to an overall complication rate of 15.9%. Minor complications included suture dehiscence (4.84%), secondary ptosis (3.4%), asymmetry (3.11%), hematoma (1.3%), and seroma (1.3%). Major complications included capsular contracture (0.7%) and infection (1.0%). Reoperations were primarily required for major complications or patient-reported aesthetic dissatisfaction. Overall outcomes were comparable to those reported in the literature. Conclusions Within a structured academic program with direct attending supervision, augmentation mastopexy can be safely performed by residents, achieving complication rates comparable to published data. These findings support the role of supervised augmentation mastopexy as a valuable component of plastic surgery training.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7161789288
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Francesco Marena, Aline Carrer Bortolini, Alcemar Maia Souto, Farid Hakme, Tito Brambullo |
| Journal | Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/asjof/ojag090
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.