Blood and Urine Biomarkers for Assessing Dialysis Adequacy in Chronic and End-Stage Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

Clicks: 1
ID: 314159
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal

Ranked #248 of 254 articles by views in Yemen Journal of Medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 254 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Background: Traditional dialysis adequacy assessment relies on urea-based kinetics, such as Kt/V, which overlooks aspects of uremic toxicity, including middle molecule buildup, inflammation, and tubular stress. Blood and urine biomarkers provide a more comprehensive and personalized approach. This systematic review evaluates their prognostic and diagnostic value for dialysis adequacy and clinical outcomes in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4 to 5 and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Methods: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science (January 2000–December 2025) for relevant studies. Two reviewers independently handled selection, extraction, and quality assessment via the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: Of 2847 records, 48 studies (n = 41,326 patients) were included. Inflammatory biomarkers (e.g., sTNFR1, sTNFR2, CRP) were strongly associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (pooled HR for sTNFR1, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.58–2.19]). Middle molecules (β2-microglobulin) and protein-bound toxins (indoxyl sulfate) are linked to mortality and cardiovascular events. Urinary tubular injury markers (NGAL, KIM-1) predicted residual kidney function (RKF) decline in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, for example, 25% faster RKF loss per 50% urinary KIM-1 increase over 18 months in PD cohorts, with independent prognostic value for ESKD progression. Biomarkers often added value beyond Kt/V, though assay heterogeneity, timing, and normalization hindered comparisons. Conclusions: Blood and urine biomarkers deliver pathophysiological insights surpassing urea kinetics, promising personalized dialysis. Translation requires assay standardization, decision thresholds, and interventional trials confirming that biomarker-guided strategies improve outcomes.
Reference Key
2026blood Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Elmukhtar Habas, Hafedh Ghazouani, Ala Habas, Khaled Alarabi, Eshrak Habas, Amnna Rayani
Journal Yemen Journal of Medicine
Year 2026
DOI
10.63475/yjm.v5i1.0283
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.