GLODS-SI: Scale-Invariant Global–Local Direct Search for Engineering Design Optimization
Clicks: 19
ID: 314021
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
5.4
/100
19 views
5 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #3 of 31 articles by views in journal of computational design and engineering
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Engineering design optimization frequently involves decision variables spanning disparate physical scales, such as spatial coordinates in millimeters coexisting with electrical resistances in kilohms, or dimensionless material fractions alongside dimensional thicknesses. Under such heterogeneity, derivative-free optimizers that rely on absolute distances for algorithmic decisions tend to degrade, as step sizes and proximity tests become biased toward large-range variables. This paper presents GLODS-SI, a scale-invariant reformulation of the GLODS derivative-free global optimization framework. Rather than a preprocessing normalization, GLODS-SI adopts a two-space algorithmic formulation: all geometric operations—trial-point generation, polling, distance computations, and merging decisions—are performed in normalized coordinates [0, 1]n, while objective evaluations are carried out in the original variables. This decoupling ensures that step-size and merging parameters acquire an intrinsic, dimensionless meaning independent of variable units and ranges, eliminating the need for problem-specific parameter tuning. The reformulation preserves all convergence guarantees of the original GLODS framework, and introduces a reproducible benchmarking methodology for evaluating scale sensitivity, including seven deterministic scaling strategies with contrasts up to 108. Numerical experiments on 63 benchmark problems show that GLODS-SI maintains consistently high success rates (84–91%) across all scaling regimes, whereas the original formulation degrades to 70–84% under heterogeneous scales. A comparison with NOMAD, a widely used derivative-free solver, further confirms the competitiveness of GLODS-SI under the full evaluation budget. The scaling toolkit and benchmark suite are publicly available; the complete GLODS-SI implementation will be released upon acceptance.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7161536100
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | José F A Madeira |
| Journal | journal of computational design and engineering |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/jcde/qwag049
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.