“This is not our mandate”: A qualitative case study on the resilience of a humanitarian health programme in Lebanon
Clicks: 1
ID: 314003
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #61 of 66 articles by views in Health policy and planning
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Decision-making in humanitarian crises is rarely based on evidence and often constrained by uncertainty. Humanitarian health organisations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) operate in conflict settings, characterised by multi-layered, complex crises. Understanding how their decision-making processes influence the continuity of humanitarian health operations can provide insight to inform the development of resilience-oriented interventions in these contexts. We conducted a qualitative case study on the ICRC health operations in Lebanon, with the objective of exploring the elements shaping decision-making, and understanding how different organisational factors influenced absorptive, adaptive, and transformative capacities in response to disruptive events in a hospital programme. Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with ICRC decision-makers. Data were analysed through qualitative content analysis. Three themes emerged, describing how decisions were shaped by people and the trust they were able to develop in internal and external relationships; political considerations often overriding public health priorities; and unresolved tensions around the institutional identity and mandate. Resilience capacities were sustained by different factors. Absorptive capacities were primarily sustained by the availability of material resources, as well as operational contingency plans allowing for flexibility in their allocation. Adaptive capacities were strengthened by cohesive social networks among committed team members. Transformative capacities were limited, promoted by the ability to innovate while at the same time constrained by a rigid organisational culture. Our findings suggest that health governance and local leadership need to be strengthened to enable transformative capacities within humanitarian organisations. Through this, accountability and legitimacy can be enhanced, especially amid growing critiques and dramatically contracting funding.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7161562987
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Claudia Truppa, Martina Valente, Giulia Celentano, Catherine Savoy, Luca Ragazzoni, Dell Saulnier |
| Journal | Health policy and planning |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/heapol/czag068
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.