Building a behavioral health crisis response program: a qualitative implementation case study

Clicks: 3
ID: 313864
2026
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Star

Ranked #39 of 98 articles by views in Health Affairs Scholar

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Abstract Introduction Mobile crisis response programs (MCPs) are increasingly recognized as effective alternatives to law enforcement-led interventions for addressing behavioral health crises. However, there is limited evidence on how specific strategies and contextual factors shape the design and implementation of these programs. This study aimed to characterize key factors influencing the early development and implementation of a county-led MCP in Northern California in 2023. Methods Between 2022 and 2023, we conducted 58 interviews with stakeholders involved in program design and implementation, as well as frontline staff. Results The data revealed four major themes. First, sociopolitical momentum played a critical role in aligning political will and securing longitudinal funding. Second, a collaborative design process involving cross-sector stakeholders enabled broad buy-in and tailoring to community needs. Third, workforce shortages posed challenges to scaling, which this program managed through flexible hiring and staffing measures. Finally, MCP coordination with existing services, such as law enforcement and emergency medical services, benefits from strong foundational relationships and can be improved through clear role definition and protocols. Conclusion In total, this study identifies actionable policies, including protocolizing collaboration, cross-sector engagement, and implementation flexibility, which may inform the establishment of MCPs elsewhere.
Reference Key
openalex_W7160854462 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Teja Pattabhiraman, Mark Fleming, Theodore Michaels, Aoife McDermott, Danielle MacVicar, Amanda Brewster
Journal Health Affairs Scholar
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/haschl/qxag106
URL
https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxag106
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.