The enigmatic mating system of White-winged Fairywrens ( Malurus leucopterus )
Clicks: 16
ID: 313834
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
4.5
/100
16 views
5 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #12 of 55 articles by views in behavioral ecology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract Group-living social systems are common in nature, but the adaptive benefits of these social systems and how they relate to mating systems have not been well studied. White-winged Fairywrens have one of the most complex and enigmatic avian social systems. Group territories are occupied and defended by up to 20 adults in brown plumage and one adult male in ornamented plumage (vivid blue and white on mainland Australia; black and white on two islands off the west coast), with up to five pairs breeding on each group territory, often with assistance from helpers. The adaptive benefits of this social structure and how it relates to the species’ mating structure have not been studied. Here we present a field study of two populations (one island, one mainland) during two consecutive breeding seasons in which we documented the social structure of adults and quantified the genetic relationships between 205 adults, 34 juveniles, and 158 nestlings. First- and second-order kin relationships between adults were more commonly observed across group territories than within, and although more than 70% of nestlings were sired by extrapair males, most extrapair sires were from outside of the social group territory. When social mates were first- or second-order kin, extrapair males were almost always unrelated, and extrapair males tended to be in better condition than the pair males they cuckolded. Our results do not clearly support previously suggested hypotheses (kin selection or cuckoldry) for this species’ complex social structure. The functional benefits of this social system remain enigmatic.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7160843476
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Joseph F. Welklin, Colleen Poje, Jeremy Collison, Melanie Rathburn, Michael S. Webster, Robert Montgomerie |
| Journal | behavioral ecology |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/beheco/arag052
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.