Effect of Cognitive and Appetitive Faculties in the Numerical Proficiency of Grade 10 Students: A Correlational Study

Clicks: 3
ID: 313546
2021
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The study aimed to determine whether the appetitive and cognitive faculty of a learner significantly correlate to their numerical proficiency. Using simple random sampling, five sections of Grade-10 were chosen as respondents consisting of 120 Grade 10 junior high school learners. Using the descriptive-correlation design, survey questionnaires and an objective test were used in gathering data. The data gathered were analyzed using mean, standard deviation and Pearson correlation coefficient. The findings disclosed that the mean of appetitive faculty of junior high school learners is high. The level of cognitive faculty of junior high school learners is moderate. Meanwhile, the numerical proficiency level of the junior high school students is proficient. The findings also showed that there is a significant relationship between the appetitive and cognitive faculty of the junior high school students. However, no significant relationship was found between appetitive faculty and numerical proficiency, and cognitive faculty and numerical proficiency.   Publication History Version of Record online: December 29, 2021 Manuscript accepted: December 27, 2021 Manuscript revised: December 23, 2021 Manuscript received: May 4, 2021
Reference Key
ranti2021effectofcognitiveand Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ranti Timario; Romano Sudaria
Journal AsTEN Journal of Teacher Education
Year 2021
DOI
10.56278/asten.v5i1.1769
URL
https://po.pnuresearchportal.org/ejournal/index.php/asten/article/download/1769/543
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.