Hazard mitigation and stabilization of subgrade slopes: advances and comparisons between China and Europe
Clicks: 1
ID: 313472
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #4 of 25 articles by views in Transportation Safety and Environment
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Abstract With the continuous development of global transportation infrastructure, instability of subgrade slopes poses critical safety challenges, particularly in regions with complex geological structures and varying climates. Traditional risk assessment and stabilization measures under extreme weather conditions often exhibit limited adaptability and accuracy, making them insufficient to meet the safety requirements of current transportation projects. Consequently, researchers have explored improved frameworks for slope hazard mitigation, leading to a multitude of significant advances in recent years. Employing a systematic review combined with a comparative case study methodology, this paper analyzes 2276 publications from 1991 to 2025 and examines five representative cases to synthesize research advances in China and Europe. The methodological framework encompasses the influencing factors of slope stability, risk assessment approaches, monitoring and early-warning technologies, as well as stabilization measures. The comparative analysis reveals distinct management philosophies: China prioritizes engineering control and site-specific monitoring, whereas Europe emphasizes risk adaptation and regional resilience, demonstrating substantial complementarity between their respective strengths. Future collaboration should prioritize the formulation of unified technical standards and cross-border data sharing mechanisms. Finally, prospective directions are proposed with regard to green engineering, intelligent early warning, and climate-resilient design to support sustainable infrastructure development.
| Reference Key |
openalex_W7161156730
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Huicong Yu, Ling Zeng, Jing Tang, Jintao Luo, Qianfeng Gao, Xinyang Wu, Yuhang Xie, Hanbing Bian |
| Journal | Transportation Safety and Environment |
| Year | 2026 |
| DOI |
10.1093/tse/tdag008
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.