Who Leads, Who Treats, What Dose? European Paediatric DTC Practice – an EXPeRT survey

Clicks: 21
ID: 313470
2026
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #93 of 122 articles by views in european journal of endocrinology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 122 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To map real-world management of paediatric differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) across Europe and identify targets for harmonisation. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, web-based survey of centres providing paediatric DTC care. METHODS: One consolidated response per centre was requested from a clinician overseeing paediatric DTC. The instrument covered centre profile/multidisciplinary tumour board organisation; staging and guideline use; risk stratification and dynamic response; diagnostics; surgery/lymph node management; radioiodine therapy (RAIT) policy and activity selection; Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone targets, follow-up, shared-care/transition. Analyses were descriptive at centre level. RESULTS: Forty-two centres from 18 countries participated. Among centres answering each item, university/academic hospitals ≈75%; paediatric age cut-off ≤18 y ≈70%; dedicated multidisciplinary tumour board (MDT) ≈60%. Staging systems varied and the primary guidance was mixed (∼30%), American Thyroid Association (ATA) 2015 (∼25-30%), national (∼20-25%), or European Thyroid Association (ETA) 2022 (∼10-15%). Dynamic response-to-therapy categories were commonly used. For unilateral presumed low-risk disease, hemithyroidectomy was the usual initial surgery in about two-thirds to three-quarters of centres, total thyroidectomy was less frequent. For low-risk patients, RAIT policy split between de-escalation (≈55%) and risk-adapted use (≈45%). When given, activity was determined by weight, dosimetry, or fixed empiric approaches. Country-level patterns were evident (ETA- vs ATA-leaning/national environments). CONCLUSIONS: Across Europe, centres broadly endorse risk-adapted care but diverge at key decision nodes-extent of surgery, formal risk framework, and RAIT in low-risk disease-reflecting guidance plurality and organisational context. Leveraging existing infrastructures offers pragmatic avenues to reduce unwarranted variation while generating paediatric-specific evidence to refine recommendations.
Reference Key
openalex_W7161255509 Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors
Journal european journal of endocrinology
Year 2026
DOI
10.1093/ejendo/lvag091
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.