Between Algorithms and Everyday Choices: University Students’ Perspectives on AI For Campus Sustainability
Clicks: 1
ID: 313335
2024
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
0.0
/100
1 views
0 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Ranked #11 of 14 articles by views in Digital & Social Review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study investigates how Hungarian higher‑education students interacted with AI-supported sustainability systems in their daily life at campus, specifically in relation to food services, mobility planning, and real‑time environmental feedback. Using semi‑structured interviews and a focus group with 32 students across multiple institutions, thematic analysis revealed three phases of interaction: sense‑making, trust construction, and behavior change. In the sense‑making phase, students engaged with the systems using pragmatic considerations like time, tangibility, prior understandings, and fitting into their daily life. Perceived value of what was produced was lessened when inputs were unclear regarding the context or unfriendly regarding the communication format. Trust developed through layered assessments of risk. Early trust was related to transparent data origins; trust developed through student-performed verification in situ; and trust was reinforced through social validation through affordability of services, fair pricing, inclusivity, and language accessibility. Trust diminished when the system stripped away autonomy, masked trade-offs, burdened cognition, or could not deliver cues to action. Behavior change appeared to happen when systems eliminated the friction of decision making, while aligning to previous habits. Sustained acceptance required ongoing trust and perceived value. The findings contribute to understanding of how AI-mediated sustainability initiatives are perceived, validated, and acted upon in the context of higher education, while providing design implications for systems seeking to be inclusive, transparent, and behavior changing
| Reference Key |
imported_1778213159_69fd6127ab4e9
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Hunain Ellahi |
| Journal | Digital & Social Review |
| Year | 2024 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.